The limits to errors/defects/failures

Errors, defects, failures, etc., result from execution of wrong decisions and are summarised here as mistakes. States, groups and individuals commit them; they occur during actions in and interactions with nature as well as in the cultural spaces established in it. Of course the spaces of time between realising a mistake and the onset of the attempt to its prevention or correction as well as the success message about its elimination depends on innumerable factors, so that these cannot be listed here; this also accounts for the numerous categories of mistakes and different dimensions and orders of magnitude of effected damage. There are mistakes because of wrongly biased confirmation, retrospective view, reminiscence, attribution, continuation, self suggestion and because of alternative facts and fake news; they occur due to manipulation, self deception and the"better-than-average-effekt", routine blindness, procrastination, emotionally biased decisions, obstinacy, overestimation of one's own capacities, exaggeration, arrogance, superbia, wrong pride, know all manner, subjectivity, illusion of control, denial/loss of reality, escapism, repression, mental inactivity, inconsequence, indifference, heuristic way of thinking, impatience, inaccuracy, carelessness, avoidance of cognitive dissonance, irresponsibility, etc. (GEO 03/2012: 136-149). It is a problem, if there is throughout no will to see the mistake; if there detection is faked by lobby-groups; if power secures their continuation and if they are even subsidised in order to make more money. It is a disastrous situation in the case of irreparable damage/injury caused by mistake. It is intolerable for impaired persons, if it was ordered per final jurisdictional decree of the court that nobody is liable for the damage/injury/fatality caused by a mistake.

Therefore the recommendation: Make Your decision or start Your experiment only after sufficient time for reflection; and if You got aware that You errored nevertheless, then trace and recognise Your mistake, learn from it, evolve and improve the following attempt, if necessary; You owe that to common sense and to Your responsibility. And try vigorously to falsify Your all the best thesis and replace it with a better one. Never stop doubting. Permanent and critical scrutinising of own actions and intentions (Sokrates) might be the universal principle of each positive and constructive development of culture; unfortunately this is by far not realised in every case, as shown by the following arbitrary examples: 25.05.2020: murder of George Floyd; 10.03.2019: crash of Boeing 73 Max; 25.01.2019: tailings dam failure at Brumadinho (Brazil); 07.01.2015: assault in editorial office Charlie Hebdo (Paris); 17.07.2014: downing of flight MH17 of Malaysian Airlines; 24.07.2010: mass panic at love parade in Duisburg; 20.04.2010: Deepwater Horizon blowout; ca. 2007: extinction of the animal species Melomys rubicola; 16.01.2003: Columbia Space Shuttle disaster; 04.-07.1994: genocide in Ruanda; 28.09.1994: capsisinig of MS Estonia in the Baltic Sea; 26.04.1986: nuclear core meltdown at Chernobyl; 05.09.1972: Munich Olympic Massacre; 10.11.1966: Gang rape and murder of Vietnamese woman Phan Thi Mo; 1960: Onset of the environmental crisis at Lake Aral; 01.10.1957: onset of the Contergan scandal; 06.-09.08.1945: drop of two atomic bombs over Japanese cities; 01.09.1939: provocation of the second world war by Nazi Germany; 06.05.1937: airship havary at Lakehurst; 14.04.1912: sinking of RMS Titanic in the Labrador Sea; etc..

George H. Tulloch, who filmed, studied, searched and recovered artifacts from the wreck, concluded as follows about error culture: „The Titanic is a symbol for the price we had to pay for our courage. And the objects we recovered, symbolise that the rediscovery of our failure is essential, so that we are saddened, that we heal us and we grow.“ (SPIEGEL TV GmbH: 14.04.1912: Die letzten Stunden der unsinkbaren Titanic.- DVD-Edition, Nr. 33, 2012). Accordingly, learning from mistakes is optimally effective in that case, if original fragments or relicts of the havary/failure are recovered and presented in the wide public. The longer the search for such outcomes of human mistakes lasts, the more difficult the access to and the recovery of them has turned out to be and the larger the dimension of human mistake has been, the higher their pedagogic value.

However, the factor of the dimension of mistake implies a restriction of the general feasibility of the principle of the multiple applicable „try and error“: mentioned repeatability is only given for these kinds of mistakes, whose effects do not sustainably impinge or tip the overall greater general system and let its state continue more or less intactly. But since the onset of development of industrial technology, the detrimental consequences of mistakes can have enormous dimensions. If too many - different or again and again the same - mistakes add in their effects, because they were not identified timely or because they were ignored willingly despite one's better knowledge, then it becomes possible that these have in their whole sum sufficient potential and momentum to change the whole general system sustainably and irreversible (i. e. „to pull all into the abyss“), because essential points were not effectively and timely amended: e. g. advancement of a sustainable turnover in resource economy, establishment of the new ethical value system included in the Era of Enlightenment 2.0, averting the third World War. A new situation has originated: because of the global effect of that type of mistake on the old general system, no intact areas can exist any more, out of which a second attempt could be launched, willing to try again and to improve. A development according to the above described method „try and error“ has become impossible.

Due to the totality of the effect of such mistakes, the preexisting - nature and culture - has became extinct, dissolved, fragmented or transformed. Because of interactions between effects caused by mistakes, unpredictable emergencies might evolve. Rescue or recovery will have become impossible, because no system - or parts of it - has remained in unchanged state, out of which relief actions might occur; and wherein the rescued / recovered can be deposited safely. There is yet the option of conservation, limited in time and size: it consists in transferring valuable or iconic objects of the old integral system timely into artificial niches established in the new system like museums, botanic gardens, zoos, archives, seed-vaults, ice core deposits, etc., where they still can be preserved for some time. Also by means of these evidence objects, the underlying mistake can be analysed, realised, interpreted and used for corrections in mental development. Objects preserved from nature recall to lost paradises, those preserved from culture remember very often mistakes.

In analogy to the Titanic wreck resting for a long time on the deep sea floor, the earth system would be positioned after transgression of tipping points in global locked-in state characterised by stable hothouse condition. All must be done to avoid the ultimate boundary mistake, which might occur after the holocaust of reason.

Learning from mistakes, so reads a classic proverb. This behaviour resulted in numerous benign constituents of cultural development; see echapter 17 of my book. But the fact that mistakes known since long remained unresolved and that their consequences have effected that the earth system has moved close to critical tipping points, means that the realisation of evidence based knowledge has been prevented/procrastinated too long. The multiple reasons therefore were listed in chapter 19 of my book. Destructive and intentional interventions of that kind must stop immediately.

Hubert Engelbrecht

Zurck / Home